Rob Minkoff, who co-directed the 1994 animated Disney film “The Lion King” with Roger Allers, highlighted the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in filmmaking during an interview with CNBC. He described AI as a “Wild West” with few rules, where the technology could significantly lower the costs of producing and directing films by reducing the need for expensive equipment. Comment According to Minkoff, this could “democratize” the content creation process, allowing a broader range of voices to emerge. Speaking before the Reply AI Film Festival, an AI short film competition organized by Italian tech firm Reply during the Venice International Film Festival, Minkoff underscored that while AI offers exciting opportunities, there are also substantial concerns, particularly around copyright infringement and intellectual property. Reflecting on past technological advancements, Minkoff drew parallels with the industry’s initial reaction to computer animation in the 1990s. He pointed out that, as with any new technology, industry professionals must adapt to maintain relevance. Minkoff cited his experience using computers to create the famous stampede scene in “The Lion King,” where “thousands of wildebeests” were rendered in a way that blended seamlessly with the hand-drawn animation. Comment Minkoff acknowledged the valid concerns regarding AI’s use in film, particularly in the areas of copyright and intellectual property. He suggested the establishment of a dedicated body to protect filmmakers’ rights and ensure proper compensation, similar to organizations like the American Society for Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) in the music industry. Despite these concerns, Minkoff expressed doubt that the momentum behind AI would slow, suggesting that decisions on the appropriate use of the technology would likely be left to judges and courtrooms. Filippo Rizzante, chief technology officer of Reply, which organized the Reply AI Film Festival, noted AI’s progress in creative production. Rizzante argued that while AI will “completely change how the industry is delivering content today,” it won’t necessarily decrease the number of people employed in the film industry. Comment He cited examples from this year’s festival, such as the runner-up film “Gia Pham,” which utilized AI tools like DALL-E and Midjourney to create visual worlds that were previously unimaginable. Alexander de Lukowicz, co-director of “Gia Pham,” emphasized that AI tools best complement human creativity. While AI holds promise for making filmmaking more accessible and diverse, it remains essential to balance innovation with respect for creators’ rights and safeguard artistic integrity. For more news and insights, visit AI News on our website.
byu/pure_soas from discussion
inArtificialInteligence
byu/pure_soas from discussion
inArtificialInteligence
byu/pure_soas from discussion
inArtificialInteligence
Lion King Director Calls AI a ‘Wild West’ with Power to Democratize Filmmaking!
Key Takeaways:
“People are naturally and understandably worried when they look at what AI can do,” Minkoff noted, emphasizing that the technology may not replace filmmakers altogether, but the current discourse around AI’s capabilities is filled with “hyperbole.”
“When computer animation came along, there were a lot of people that were very afraid about it — what it would mean, how it would impact people’s jobs,” he recalled.
Minkoff added, “I understand why people might want to slow it down or put guardrails on it to be careful, to be safe.”
He added, “My impression is that it probably won’t be slowed down because these decisions are left to judges and courtrooms to decide what’s right and wrong.”
He stated, “It’s always the human behind the technology that has to guide the technology to gain the proper result out of it.”
Was this article helpful?
YesNo