In another big news, more than 10,500 actors, musicians, and authors have united to protest the unlicensed use of their creative works to train artificial intelligence (AI) models.
An open letter, backed by prominent figures such as Thom Yorke from Radiohead, members of ABBA, and The Cure, denounces tech companies’ use of copyrighted content without the consent of its creators.
The signatories assert that AI companies, including OpenAI, have unfairly exploited their artistic content, using it to train AI models that generate new music, literature, and other forms of art.
Despite claims by tech companies that this use qualifies under “fair use” laws, the artists argue otherwise, demanding action to stop the unauthorized exploitation of their work.
Prominent Figures Take a Stand
The protest is bolstered by the support of high-profile names in the entertainment industry. Figures like Julianne Moore, Kevin Bacon, and Ann Patchett have added their voices to the growing movement.
This comes as part of a larger trend of artists and creators expressing frustration over how rapidly advancing AI technology is infringing on their intellectual property rights.
In particular, Scarlett Johansson, whose voice was reportedly used for OpenAI’s chatbot without permission, has been drawn into the conversation.
Today we’re publishing a statement on AI training, signed by 10,000+ creators already:
“The unlicensed use of creative works for training generative AI is a major, unjust threat to the livelihoods of the people behind those works, and must not be permitted.”
Signatories include… pic.twitter.com/AqVaEThMs4
— Ed Newton-Rex (@ednewtonrex) October 22, 2024
Though she has not yet signed the open letter, her involvement underscores the broad scope of concerns shared by actors, musicians, and writers alike.
October 22, 2024: AI and Election Security 2024: Deepfakes & Cyber Threats October 23, 2024: What Are Targets, Objectives, And Tactics of AI Political Deepfakes? October 23, 2024: Tech Giants Step Up Measures to Prevent AI Misuse in 2024 ElectionsCheck Out Our Exclusive US Election Coverage
The Unfolding Legal Battle
Lawsuits challenging the legality of using copyrighted content for AI training are already underway, setting the stage for a potential shift in how intellectual property rights are interpreted in the digital era.
These legal actions could pave the way for more stringent protections for creators as they seek to safeguard their livelihoods against the unchecked development of AI.
The stakes are high for both artists and tech companies. A court ruling in favor of the creators could fundamentally reshape how AI models are trained, requiring companies to obtain explicit permission before using any copyrighted material.
This would represent a victory for artists and may impose new limitations on AI’s role in creative fields.
I would like to see more architects in there, genAI is currently being promoted a lot in concept architecture&visualisation with courses in unis as well. People are not aware of the exploitation of creative works and the copyright issues involved throughout their design process.
— Fanis Anastasiadis (@FAnastasiadis) October 22, 2024
The Broader Implications for Creators
Many artists fear that the increasing use of AI to produce creative content will diminish the value of human-made works and may even lead to a future where the demand for real artistic input declines.
The protest letter is not only a fight for fair compensation but also for the future of human creativity in a landscape where AI-generated content is becoming increasingly prevalent.
As Melissa Joan Hart and other signatories of the letter argue, this issue goes beyond compensation—it’s about protecting the essence of creative work from being commodified by AI.
These concerns reflect broader apprehensions within creative industries that, without stricter regulations, AI could undermine the very industries it depends on for its training data.
“The unlicensed use of creative works for training young creatives is a major, unjust threat to the livelihoods of the people behind those works, and must not be permitted.”
— Dr Paul Marsden (@marsattacks) October 22, 2024
This collective protest by over 10,500 creatives serves as a powerful reminder that ethical considerations must be prioritized as AI continues to develop.
The outcome of this movement and the legal battles that follow will likely determine the future dynamics between AI innovation and intellectual property rights, with far-reaching implications for both tech companies and the global creative community.
October 3, 2024: AI Threat: Russia, Iran, China Target 2024 U.S. Election October 3, 2024: Kamala Harris Campaign Motorcade Stalled by Confused Robotaxis! August 22, 2024: Google AI Axes YouTube Music Team Amidst Pay Protests in Austin City Council!
For more news and insights, visit AI News on our website.