SAG-AFTRA Secures Victory with California Bill to Regulate AI Replicas in Entertainment!

  • Editor
  • August 29, 2024
    Updated
sag-aftra-secures-victory-with-california-bill-to-regulate-ai-replicas-in-entertainment

Key Takeaways:

  • The California Senate has passed Assembly Bill 2602 (AB 2602), requiring explicit consent from performers for AI-generated digital replicas, marking a significant milestone in protecting artists’ rights.
  • The bill expands protections to include commercial work, video games, and non-union performances, broadening its impact beyond traditional SAG-AFTRA agreements.
  • The Motion Picture Association (MPA) initially opposed the bill, but after amendments to address concerns, it took a neutral stance, showing the complexity of balancing AI innovation with performers’ rights.
  • Governor Gavin Newsom’s decision on signing the bill into law remains uncertain, given his recent history of vetoing bills despite majority support within his party.

On Tuesday, the California Senate passed a bill endorsed by SAG-AFTRA intended to protect performers from unauthorized AI replication. AB 2642, a recent version of the legislation, would require explicit permission from performers (or their representatives) in order to use so-called “AI” software to create digital replicas.

“We are thrilled that one of our top legislative priorities, bill AB 2602 has passed in the State of California. The bill which protects not only SAG-AFTRA performers but all performers, is a huge step forward. Voice and likeness rights, in an age of digital replication, must have strong guardrails around licensing to protect from abuse, this bill provides those guardrails,” Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator for SAG-AFTRA, said in a statement.

The bill uses similar language to the contract SAG-AFTRA won from the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) in 2023, but it extends protections to include commercial work, video games, and non-union work.

The bill, in its current form, defines a digital replica as a “computer-generated, highly realistic electronic representation that is readily identifiable as the voice or visual likeness of an individual that is embodied in a sound recording, image, audiovisual work, or transmission in which the actual individual either did not actually perform or appear, or the actual individual did perform or appear, but the fundamental character of the performance or appearance has been materially altered.”

This definition aims to provide clear legal boundaries regarding what constitutes a digital replica and under what circumstances it can be used.

The bill would not apply to “the electronic reproduction, use of a sample of one sound recording or audiovisual work into another, remixing, mastering, or digital remastering of a sound recording or audiovisual work authorized by the copyright holder.”

These exceptions were included to address concerns raised by the Motion Picture Association (MPA), which initially opposed the bill. The MPA argued that it could interfere with common post-production techniques; however, after some amendments, the MPA shifted to a neutral position.

It’s unclear if the bill would prevent studios from refusing to hire actors who do not consent to be replicated. There are also questions about how the legislation would affect the replication of performances in which the actor is not immediately recognizable.


This ambiguity leaves room for potential legal challenges or further clarifications in the future.

The bill will now return to the California Assembly, which must approve the changes made in the State Senate. If passed there as expected, it will be sent to California Governor Gavin Newsom. While Newsom hasn’t indicated one way or the other, it’s widely expected he will sign it into law.

However, Newsom’s recent vetoes of several bills—despite having majority support within his party and among core Democratic voters, including those in Hollywood—add an element of uncertainty to his decision on AB 2602.


Over the last year, he vetoed a law that would have formally outlawed caste discrimination, a bill requiring judges to consider parental acceptance of a child’s gender identity in custody disputes, a bill intended to provide accountability in how money is spent on homelessness services and a bill that would have given striking workers unemployment benefits.

The broader context of Newsom’s political strategy could influence his decision.

If Kamala Harris wins the presidency this year, Newsom may no longer be positioning himself for a potential presidential run in 2028, which could alter his veto calculus. This uncertainty adds another layer of complexity to the bill’s fate.


In addition to AB 2602, SAG-AFTRA is also advocating for the “No Fakes Act” on a federal level, which would make it unlawful to create a digital replica of anyone—whether a performer or a regular person—without their consent.

The union’s push for such legislation underscores the increasing concerns about AI’s impact on privacy and creative rights.


The federal push, along with California’s legislative efforts, reflects a growing movement to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in digital media and entertainment to ensure ethical practices are upheld.

If signed into law, AB 2602 could set a precedent for other states to follow, potentially reshaping how digital likenesses are managed in the entertainment industry.

For more news and insights, visit AI News on our website.

Was this article helpful?
YesNo
Generic placeholder image

Dave Andre

Editor

Digital marketing enthusiast by day, nature wanderer by dusk. Dave Andre blends two decades of AI and SaaS expertise into impactful strategies for SMEs. His weekends? Lost in books on tech trends and rejuvenating on scenic trails.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *