On Tuesday, the California Senate passed a bill endorsed by SAG-AFTRA intended to protect performers from unauthorized AI replication. AB 2642, a recent version of the legislation, would require explicit permission from performers (or their representatives) in order to use so-called “AI” software to create digital replicas. The bill uses similar language to the contract SAG-AFTRA won from the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) in 2023, but it extends protections to include commercial work, video games, and non-union work. This definition aims to provide clear legal boundaries regarding what constitutes a digital replica and under what circumstances it can be used. These exceptions were included to address concerns raised by the Motion Picture Association (MPA), which initially opposed the bill. The MPA argued that it could interfere with common post-production techniques; however, after some amendments, the MPA shifted to a neutral position. It’s unclear if the bill would prevent studios from refusing to hire actors who do not consent to be replicated. There are also questions about how the legislation would affect the replication of performances in which the actor is not immediately recognizable. The entertainment industry trying to tackle AI pic.twitter.com/cXEMRrNM5F — Mehul Desai (@TechNoirUK) August 28, 2024 The bill will now return to the California Assembly, which must approve the changes made in the State Senate. If passed there as expected, it will be sent to California Governor Gavin Newsom. While Newsom hasn’t indicated one way or the other, it’s widely expected he will sign it into law. However, Newsom’s recent vetoes of several bills—despite having majority support within his party and among core Democratic voters, including those in Hollywood—add an element of uncertainty to his decision on AB 2602. Finally, some sense in a world gone digital mad! — StarStruck Gifts (@StarstruckGifts) August 28, 2024 The broader context of Newsom’s political strategy could influence his decision. If Kamala Harris wins the presidency this year, Newsom may no longer be positioning himself for a potential presidential run in 2028, which could alter his veto calculus. This uncertainty adds another layer of complexity to the bill’s fate. Meanwhile all artist are losing their jobs in the industry. — Olya (@OlyaKarLott) August 28, 2024 The union’s push for such legislation underscores the increasing concerns about AI’s impact on privacy and creative rights. 😂 Can you imagine an AI getting locked up? Robo-jail time! 🤖🚔 — Ariel (@Ariel_xxa) August 28, 2024 If signed into law, AB 2602 could set a precedent for other states to follow, potentially reshaping how digital likenesses are managed in the entertainment industry. More news related to the California AI bill: 27-08-2024 – OpenAI Backs California Bill Mandating Labels on AI-Generated Content! 27-08-2024 – Elon Musk Shocks Tech World with Support for California AI Legislation 22-08-2024 – California’s AI Bill Faces Backlash: OpenAI Says It Will Hinder Progress! 21-08-2024 – Big Tech Advocating AI Regulation While Fighting CA AI Bill 16-08-2024 – California Relaxes AI Bill Before Final Vote Following Anthropic’s Advice 15-08-2024 – California’s AI Bill Aims to Prevent Disasters, But Silicon Valley Sees Risks! For more news and insights, visit AI News on our website.
This ambiguity leaves room for potential legal challenges or further clarifications in the future.
Over the last year, he vetoed a law that would have formally outlawed caste discrimination, a bill requiring judges to consider parental acceptance of a child’s gender identity in custody disputes, a bill intended to provide accountability in how money is spent on homelessness services and a bill that would have given striking workers unemployment benefits.
In addition to AB 2602, SAG-AFTRA is also advocating for the “No Fakes Act” on a federal level, which would make it unlawful to create a digital replica of anyone—whether a performer or a regular person—without their consent.
The federal push, along with California’s legislative efforts, reflects a growing movement to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in digital media and entertainment to ensure ethical practices are upheld.
SAG-AFTRA Secures Victory with California Bill to Regulate AI Replicas in Entertainment!
Key Takeaways:
“We are thrilled that one of our top legislative priorities, bill AB 2602 has passed in the State of California. The bill which protects not only SAG-AFTRA performers but all performers, is a huge step forward. Voice and likeness rights, in an age of digital replication, must have strong guardrails around licensing to protect from abuse, this bill provides those guardrails,” Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator for SAG-AFTRA, said in a statement.
The bill, in its current form, defines a digital replica as a “computer-generated, highly realistic electronic representation that is readily identifiable as the voice or visual likeness of an individual that is embodied in a sound recording, image, audiovisual work, or transmission in which the actual individual either did not actually perform or appear, or the actual individual did perform or appear, but the fundamental character of the performance or appearance has been materially altered.”
The bill would not apply to “the electronic reproduction, use of a sample of one sound recording or audiovisual work into another, remixing, mastering, or digital remastering of a sound recording or audiovisual work authorized by the copyright holder.”
Was this article helpful?
YesNo