Google Removes num=100 parameter in September 2025 caused a major shift in how SEO data is collected and interpreted. The update led to noticeable drops in Search Console impressions, rankings, and keyword visibility across most websites.
According to a LOCOMOTIVE Agency study, 87.7% of sites lost impressions following the change. This guide explains what the Google num=100 update means for rank tracking and Search Console accuracy, and shares best strategies to recover lost SEO data After google removed num=100.
💡 TL;DR: Google num=100 Removal Summary
- Google removed &num=100 in September 2025, breaking bulk SERP fetching for SEO tools and scripts.
- 87.7% of sites saw GSC impression drops due to data correction, not actual ranking loss.
- Continuous scroll and anti-scraping systems made the &num=100 parameter obsolete.
- Re-baseline SEO reports and focus on clicks, CTR, and conversions instead of impressions.
What Is the &num=100 Parameter? What Happens When Google Removes num=100?
The &num=100 parameter was a query string modifier in Google Search URLs that allowed users and SEO tools to display up to 100 results per page instead of the default 10. For example:
https://www.google.com/search?q=example&num=100
For SEOs, developers, and rank trackers, this feature was essential for retrieving large datasets efficiently and enabling bulk SERP collection across hundreds of keywords with fewer requests.
However, with Google’s update, &num=100 no longer works, so reports that previously fetched 100 results now return fewer, making impressions, query counts, and averages appear lower even when visibility hasn’t actually changed.
- Increased data retrieval: Let SEO and rank-tracking tools fetch 100 organic results in a single query instead of the default 10.
- Efficiency: Faster, more cost-effective SERP collection for competitive analysis and keyword tracking workflows.
What changed in September 2025
- Parameter deprecated: Google stopped supporting the &num=100 parameter around Sept 12–14, 2025.
- Return to default: Requests now show only about 10 results per page.
- Increased requests: SEO tools must issue multiple paginated calls to rebuild the same depth previously obtained with a single &num=100 query, shifting GSC metrics (impressions down; average position up) without real ranking change.
- Drop in Impressions: Up to 87.7% of websites reported impression declines in Google Search Console.
- Reduced Keyword Visibility: 77.6% of websites lost visibility for mid-tail and short-tail terms.
- More Accurate Data: Impressions now better reflect what real users see, making reports appear weaker but more realistic.
Previously, inflated impression counts came from bots and scrapers leveraging &num=100. Now, rankings and impressions are cleaner, reflecting real-world user behavior rather than deep-SERP crawler activity.
Brodie Clark on Google’s num=100 removal: “The removal of the &num=100 parameter caused major data shifts in Search Console. Impressions and keyword counts have dropped, not because sites lost visibility, but because Google is now reporting rankings more accurately.”
Are “num=100” Removals Killing SEO Data Accuracy?
Google’s removal of the &num=100 parameter in September 2025 disrupted the SEO industry’s core measurement systems. What looked like a data loss catastrophe was, in reality, a visibility recalibration exposing inflated metrics caused by bot-driven deep SERP impressions.
Survey & Market Data
- Keyword loss: 77.6% of sites lost unique ranking keywords, most between positions 21 and 100 (Zeo.org).
- Reddit sentiment: 68% of practitioners initially feared algorithmic penalties, 45% saw impression drops of 50–80%, and 23% noticed improved average positions as bot data vanished (Reddit SEO Community).
- Tool vendor impact: Semrush, Ahrefs, and AccuRanker confirmed 10x higher crawl costs and delayed reporting cycles.
- Cost shift: Before removal: 1 query = 100 results. After removal: 10 queries required for the same depth, resulting in approximately 1000% API cost increase.
- Minimal impact group: 12.3% of SEO teams already focused on top 10 optimization reported little or no effect.
Expert Opinions & Quotes
- Tim Soulo (Ahrefs CMO): “Positions 21–100 have been vanity metrics for years. If you’re not in the top 20, you’re essentially invisible to users.” (LinkedIn)
- Serge Bezborodov (JetOctopus): “Aggregate 25% impression decline across 1,000 websites in the first week.”
- Google statement: “The use of this URL parameter is not something that we formally support.”
Pros vs. Cons
- Pros: Cleaner data, reduced bot noise, more accurate rankings focused on real user behavior.
- Cons: Loss of historical continuity, higher tool costs, reduced visibility beyond page 2, steeper learning curve for analysts.
Final Assessment
Based on AllAboutAI’s analysis, approximately 90% of the reported “data loss” was the removal of bot-driven impressions.
The num=100 retirement corrected years of inflated metrics and shifted the industry toward measurement that reflects real user behavior rather than scraper activity. While 77.6% of keywords “disappeared,” the true visibility loss was minimal and accuracy finally caught up with reality.
How Continuous Scroll (and Later Pagination) Made num=100 Obsolete?
When Google introduced continuous scroll between 2022 and 2024, it temporarily replaced traditional paginated search results. SERPs no longer had fixed pages like “page 2” or “page 10”; results simply loaded as users scrolled.
This change made the &num=100 parameter obsolete since there was no longer a defined concept of “show 100 results per page.”
Even after Google reintroduced pagination on desktop in 2025, the parameter remained unsupported, confirming that Google’s intent wasto reduce bulk scraping and focus on reporting visibility based on actual user behavior.
In essence, the &num=100 removal was not a bug or penalty. It was part of a broader technical shift toward cleaner, user-centric SERP reporting and reduced automated data extraction.
Key Changes Introduced by Continuous Scroll & Modern SERPs
- Dynamic loading: Continuous scroll automatically loads more results as users move down the page, removing the idea of fixed “pages”.
- Tracking limitations: SEO tools can no longer depend on stable pagination boundaries, making deep rank tracking less consistent.
- Search Console alignment: Google Search Console focuses on user-visible impressions, aligning metrics with how real users interact with search results.
- Top 20 focus: Since few users scroll past the first visible set of results, SEO strategy now centers around top 20 visibility, clicks, and CTR rather than deep-SERP metrics.
Note: Continuous scroll remains active on mobile and select regions, but Google’s measurement logic continues to favor real user visibility over deep-SERP scraping, keeping the &num=100 parameter permanently deprecated.
How Does Google Removing num=100 Impact SEO Reporting and Rankings?
The removal of the &num=100 parameter caused visible shifts in Google Search Console data. Many sites reported sudden drops in impressions and query counts, even though their rankings and visibility remained stable.
This change impacts how SEOs interpret performance reports. Lower impression numbers and fewer tracked keywords no longer indicate ranking loss but reflect cleaner and more accurate data reporting from Google.
Rank trackers and SEO tools now need to adjust their crawling logic and increase the number of paginated requests to retrieve full datasets. As a result, performance reports may appear weaker at first glance, even if the underlying rankings are unchanged.
Impact on SEO reporting
- Data inconsistency: Reports now show a sharp decline in impressions and keyword visibility, which can seem alarming but usually reflects a data correction rather than a real loss of performance.
- Skewed metrics: The &num=100 parameter previously inflated impression counts, making performance metrics appear stronger or weaker than they actually were. Today’s data is more representative of genuine search behavior.
- Incomplete rank data: Rank trackers can no longer retrieve 100 results per query, which makes tracking deeper SERP positions slower, more costly, and prone to small data gaps.
- Inaccurate competitive analysis: With fewer available data points, it’s now harder to get a complete picture of the competitive landscape and keyword overlap across domains.
What Are the Best Strategies to Recover Lost SEO Data After Google Removed num=100?
Use these practical steps to fix reporting blind spots, stabilize dashboards, and rebuild rank tracking accuracy after Google removed &num=100. Start with quick wins, then roll into reporting and data-engineering changes.
Quick Wins (2–5 minutes)
- Annotate Sept 2025 across GSC, GA4, and Looker Studio as the “num=100 data reset.”
- Split your date ranges (Pre vs. Post Sept 2025) to avoid false YoY/MoM alarms.
- Pivot KPIs to Clicks, CTR, Conversions—stop leading with Impressions.
- Reduce tracking depth to Top 30–50; prioritize Top-20 movement where demand actually exists.
- Update all internal decks with a one-slide explainer so stakeholders don’t misread the drops.
- Step 1. Re-baseline All SEO Reporting
- Step 2. Rebuild Rank Tracking (Depth, Cost & Reliability)
- Step 3. Migrate Analysis to the GSC API (Clicks-First Reporting)
- Step 4. Update Dashboards (Looker Studio / GA4)
- Step 5. Improve Cost & Reliability for Rank Data
- Step 6. Follow the Decision Matrix (Based on GSC Patterns)
- Step 7. Communicate Updates to Stakeholders
- Step 8. Execution Playbook (30/60/90 Day Plan)
- Step 9. On-Page & Content Moves That Actually Work
1) Re-baseline All SEO Reporting
- Create a Post-Change Segment: “Post-2025-09-14” (or your exact cutover date) and use it in all dashboards.
- Stop mixing periods: Never compare impressions across the change; compare Clicks, CTR, and Goals instead.
- Calculated fields: Add “CTR delta” and “Avg Position (Top-20 only)” to isolate meaningful shifts.
2) Rebuild Rank Tracking (Depth, Cost, and Reliability)
- Depth policy: Track Top-30/50 max. Split keywords by business value (Core, Growth, Explore) and apply different depths.
- Sampling: Track 100% of Core, 50% of Growth, 25% of Explore to keep costs sane but trends visible.
- Frequency: Daily for Core, 2–3×/week for Growth, weekly for Explore. Consolidate weekend crawls where demand is low.
- Tag & segment: Group by intent (transactional, comparative, informational) and funnel stage for sharper insights.
- Top-20 focus: Add alerts for movements in positions 3, 5, 10, and 20—these are the inflection points that change traffic.
3) Migrate Analysis to the GSC API (Clicks-First Reporting)
- Dimensions:
date,query,page,country,device,searchType=web. - Filters: Start with
clicks > 0segments to remove noise; keep an “All” view for completeness. - Breakouts: Device (mobile/desktop), country clusters, and branded vs. non-branded queries.
- Metrics to feature: Clicks (primary), CTR (secondary), Impressions (context only), Avg Position (Top-20 subset).
- Export cadence: Daily pulls into a warehouse or sheet; retain 16-month rolling history for trendlines.
Why: The API reflects user-visible interactions; it’s resilient to the deep-SERP inflation num=100 created.
4) Update Dashboards (Looker Studio / GA4)
- Annotation band: Shade the chart from Sept 10–14, 2025 with a label “num=100 retired → reporting recalibration.”
- Dual-axis Clicks vs. CTR: Show that CTR improves when inflated impressions vanish.
- Top-20 lens: Add a view that hides positions >20 to de-noise the narrative for execs.
- Content cohort cards: Segment by page type (PLP, PDP, Blog, Docs) to see where real demand lives.
5) Cost & Reliability Engineering for Rank Data
- Pagination batching: If you consume third-party SERP APIs, request pages in batches with backoff and caching.
- Cache windows: 24–48h caching for Explore keywords; 12–24h for Growth; no cache for Core when volatility is high.
- Error budgets: Define acceptable gaps (e.g., 1–3% missing deep results) and don’t re-crawl aggressively to fill noise.
- Storage strategy: Keep raw pulls (for audit) + curated tables (for reporting) with a clear lineage note: “Post-num=100.”
6) Decision Matrix (What to Do Based on Your GSC Pattern)
| Your GSC pattern (since Sept 12–14, 2025) | Likely cause | Do this next |
|---|---|---|
| Impressions ↓ 30–60%, Clicks flat, Avg pos ↑ | Deep-SERP noise removed | Lock a new baseline; move reporting to Clicks/CTR; reduce tracked depth. |
| Impressions ↓ & Clicks ↓ | Recalibration + real ranking shifts | Audit top queries/landing pages; check SERP features and competitors; ship on-page fixes. |
| Keyword count ↓ (P21–100), revenue stable | Vanity metrics gone | Stop over-tracking long tails; invest in internal links to push P11–20 into Top-10. |
| Tool costs ↑ / data lag | Paginated fetching overhead | Implement sampling & batching; move analysis to GSC API for KPI-grade reporting. |
7) Stakeholder Communication (Copy-Paste Script)
Subject: About the GSC “Drop” After Google’s num=100 Change
We’re seeing lower impressions starting Sept 2025 due to Google retiring the num=100 parameter. This is a reporting recalibration, not a loss of visibility. Clicks, CTR, and conversions remain our source of truth.
Actions taken: dashboards re-baselined, Top-20 tracking focus, and API-based reporting. Expect cleaner, more realistic metrics going forward.
8) Execution Playbook (30/60/90 Days)
- Day 0–30: Annotations live; KPI shift; rank-tracking depth reduced; rebuild Core keyword set; add Top-20 alerts.
- Day 31–60: Migrate reporting to GSC API; implement sampling; refresh internal linking to elevate P11–20 pages.
- Day 61–90: Launch content updates for pages stuck P8–20; expand entity coverage; publish a post-change case study.
9) On-Page & Content Moves That Actually Move the Needle
- Internal links to near-winners: Build links to pages ranking positions 8–20 with anchor variants matching sub-intents.
- Snippet refresh: Rework title/meta to align with SGE and SERP features. Pages optimized for SEO for Landing Pages often benefit most from improved CTR.
- Entity reinforcement: Add FAQ, “People Also Ask” coverage, and schema that supports disambiguation.
- Thin page retirement: Consolidate or 410 pages that never broke Top-50 and don’t serve a funnel need.
What Does Google’s num=100 Removal Mean for Different SEO Professionals?
The impact of Google removing the &num=100 parameter varies depending on your role in SEO.Whether you manage clients, optimize in-house sites, or build SEO tools, the change reshapes how you track rankings, interpret impressions, and plan visibility strategies.
For Agency Owners: Reassure Clients and Recalibrate Reporting
Agency leaders are among the most affected by the &num=100 removal since clients often misinterpret impression drops as ranking declines.
- Client Communication: Proactively explain that post-September 2025 data reflects cleaner, human-based visibility rather than performance loss.
- Reporting Updates: Add clear dashboard annotations for Sept 12–14, 2025 to show the data baseline shift.
- Data Focus: Center reports on clicks, CTR, and conversions instead of impressions.
- Tool Costs: Adjust API budgets, as paginated fetching may increase monthly tracking expenses.
💡 Key Tip: Educate clients early that lower impressions ≠ lost visibility; it’s cleaner reporting aligned with real users.
For In-House SEOs: Adjust Dashboards and Manage Stakeholder Expectations
If you manage SEO performance internally, your analytics and reporting systems need to reflect the new reality after the num=100 removal.
- Dashboard Segmentation: Separate pre- and post-September 2025 data to prevent false comparisons.
- Stakeholder Education: Use visuals showing that impressions dropped due to data correction, not ranking loss.
- Metric Prioritization: Focus on clicks, CTR, dwell time, and conversions for more accurate KPIs.
- Keyword Strategy: Shift analysis toward Top 20 positions where real engagement happens.
💡 Key Tip: Treat this update as a reporting recalibration rather than a visibility loss event.
For SEO Tool Developers: Redesign APIs and Educate Users
SEO software vendors face the biggest technical challenge, as their rank-tracking systems relied on the 100-results-per-page model.
- API Adaptation: Switch to paginated requests and batching to preserve ranking depth accuracy.
- Infrastructure Cost: Expect higher server loads — consider Top-20 / Top-50 tiered plans for efficiency.
- User Education: Publish updates or changelogs explaining the shift in data patterns after mid-September 2025.
- SERP Sampling: Implement intelligent sampling or caching to maintain insight quality while reducing fetch volume.
💡 Key Tip: Transparency builds trust, let users know data is now more precise, not missing.
Before vs. After: How Google’s num=100 Removal Changed SEO Metrics
The following comparison shows how SEO performance metrics appeared before and after Google removed the &num=100 parameter in September 2025.
While the numbers may look weaker, the truth is your data became more accurate, reflecting what real users actually see on search results.
| Metric | Before num=100 Removal | After num=100 Removal | Why It Changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impressions | Inflated by bot traffic from positions 21–100 | 87.7% drop — reflects real user visibility only | Removed scraper-generated impressions |
| Average Position | Artificially lowered by deep SERP bot impressions | Improved — represents actual user-visible rankings | Removed irrelevant position #67+ data |
| Click-Through Rate (CTR) | Deflated by inflated impression counts | More realistic — based on real search impressions | CTR denominator now uses human-visible data |
| Keyword Count | Included 77.6% of keywords ranking between positions 21–100 | Now focuses on top 20 positions where users engage | Eliminated vanity deep-SERP metrics |
Bottom Line: Your rankings didn’t decline, your visibility reports simply became more accurate and aligned with real user behavior.
How Content Creators and SEOs Can Adapt After Google’s num=100 Removal?
The removal of Google’s &num=100 parameter doesn’t just affect SEOs and rank trackers it also changes how AllAboutAI writers and content creators approach visibility, analytics, and SEO storytelling.
With fewer impressions and less keyword data available, creators must focus on high-quality, actionable, and insight-driven content that performs even in a data-limited search landscape.
1. Write Practical Technical Guides: Readers value tutorials that teach real adaptation strategies. Focus on creating guides that help SEOs navigate data changes. For example:
– How to use Google Search Console (GSC) API as an alternative to crawling: Show readers how to retrieve performance data directly through Google’s API instead of outdated scraping methods like &num=100.
– How to utilize Bing or other search engines for keyword insights: Platforms like Bing Webmaster Tools or DuckDuckGo offer alternative keyword and ranking data that can complement Google reports.
Example Topics:
–“How to Jailbreak Gemini? [8 Techniques & Ethical Considerations]”
–“12 Best Free Website Traffic Checker Tools to Track & Analyze Visitors”
By diversifying across multiple platforms, AllAboutAI can maintain broader visibility and uncover opportunities outside Google’s closed ecosystem.
2. Focus on User Behavior and Long-Tail Strategies: With less keyword data available, the emphasis should shift toward CTR, engagement, and conversions. Encourage focusing on long-tail keywords that attract qualified, intent-driven traffic.
3. Leverage Case Studies and Storytelling: Share data-backed stories from real SEO experiments and projects to show how AllAboutAI adapted to the &num=100 removal effectively.
4. Actively Share Content Across Platforms: Don’t rely on one platform. Cross-promote AllAboutAI content on LinkedIn, your personal blog, and industry networks to expand reach and authority.
Action Plan:
– Share a snippet or short analysis on LinkedIn linking back to the full post.
– Republish or adapt parts for your personal site to improve your author profile and boost cross-domain visibility.
5. Competitor Analysis Becomes Critical: As keyword visibility decreases, identifying which competitors gained ground post-update becomes essential. Use tools like Ahrefs or Semrush to find post-num=100 keyword gaps and track new opportunities.
Action Plan:
– “Discover which competitors gained rankings after the removal of
num=100.”
-“Identify untapped keyword opportunities to regain lost visibility.”
In short, AllAboutAI writers can turn the &num=100 removal into an opportunity to innovate by focusing on accurate data, long-tail SEO, storytelling, and multi-platform visibility to stay ahead in the AI-driven search era.
Which SEO Tools Were Most Affected After Google Removed num=100?
The removal of Google’s &num=100 parameter disrupted many top SEO tools that relied on deep SERP scraping. Most platforms have switched to paginated requests, which increases API complexity, latency, and cost.
Reddit (r/SEO) insight: “Positions are distorted… check your GSC.” Some users warn that post-&num=100, tools like Ahrefs no longer reflect real visibility reliably. Read the discussion
| Tool | Impact | Fix / Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | Gaps in deeper ranking data | Fixed, updated logic |
| Semrush | Pagination issues, missing deeper results | Partial fix, rollout ongoing |
| Screaming Frog | Limited to 10 results per page | Workaround available |
| Rank Ranger | Fluctuations in visibility metrics | Temporary patch applied |
| SEO PowerSuite | Longer crawl times, data lag | Fix in progress |
| SerpAPI | Increased API request volume | Fixed, added batching system |
What Does This Mean for SEO Developers and API Users?
- Google Custom Search API: Remains unaffected; it always capped results at 10 per request.
- Third-party APIs: Providers like SerpAPI and DataForSEO now require pagination batching (e.g., 10 requests for 100 results).
- Python & automation scripts: SEOs using BeautifulSoup or Selenium must loop through paginated requests, adding cost and complexity.
- Rank tracking integrations: Custom dashboards pulling raw HTML SERPs now need throttling and caching mechanisms.
Gen Furukawa on tool adaptation: “Google just made SEO data more expensive. Focus where you can actually win attention and revenue, not on tracking everything. The num=100 removal forces strategic prioritization.”
How Can You Adapt SEO Reporting After Google Removes num=100?
The disappearance of the &num=100 parameter requires SEOs to rethink how they track, compare, and report organic visibility. Although the loss of bulk data might seem negative, it’s an opportunity to build cleaner and more reliable reporting systems.
- Re-baseline your metrics: Add annotations in dashboards and reports marking September 2025 as the “num=100 data reset.” Avoid comparing impressions before and after the removal.
- Prioritize real performance metrics: Focus on clicks, CTR, and conversions; these remain unaffected by the parameter removal.
- Adjust rank-tracking depth: Track only the top 30–50 positions per keyword to maintain relevance and reduce API load.
- Clean your keyword set: Remove low-impact long-tail queries that never reached the top 100 results.
- Use Looker Studio or GA4 filters: Segment post-update data into a new reporting range for fairer trend comparisons.
Pro Tip: Treat this update as a data migration event rather than a ranking drop. Reset benchmarks and communicate to stakeholders that this change increases accuracy, not decreases visibility.
Is Google Removing num=100 Part of a Bigger AI-Era Data Strategy?
Google’s decision to remove &num=100 aligns with a broader pattern: restricting open data as AI-driven search products evolve. The change coincides with Google’s rollout of SGE (Search Generative Experience) and continuous scroll, signaling a more closed search ecosystem.
AllAboutAI Analysis: Google’s num=100 removal signals a shift from open SERP data to AI-controlled visibility, the first step toward tighter data consolidation in AI-driven search.
- Reduced transparency: SEOs now have less access to full SERP datasets, mirroring how AI systems like ChatGPT or Gemini consume curated, not raw, search data.
- Strategic control: Google can maintain data consistency while reducing external data mining.
- Industry shift: Future SEO tools may rely on aggregated API data rather than direct scraping, changing how visibility is measured.
What Is the SEO Community Saying About Google Removes num=100?
Reddit threads reveal how SEOs, analysts, and AI researchers are reacting to Google’s removal of the num=100 parameter from interpreting its impact on Search Console metrics to debating whether it’s part of Google’s larger AI data-lockdown strategy.
These community discussions shed light on how professionals are recalibrating rank tracking, impression analysis, and SEO reporting after the change.
💬 Reddit: Google Removing num=100 Is Actually Good News?
In r/SEO, users are debating whether Google removing num=100 is ultimately beneficial. Some SEOs argue it’s a positive shift toward more accurate impression and position data in Search Console, while others express frustration over losing deeper keyword visibility and API efficiency.
🤖 Reddit: Did Google Just Cut Off 90% of the Internet from AI?
Over on r/ArtificialIntelligence, users connect the num=100 removal to a broader trend of Google restricting data access for AI systems. The discussion suggests that this move could mark the beginning of a tighter ecosystem where AI models and SEO tools get less open SERP data.
📊 Reddit: How Did the Avg. Position in GSC Increase After num=100 Removal?
In another r/SEO thread, professionals are analyzing why average position metrics increased in Search Console after the update. Contributors explain that impressions beyond the first 10 results are no longer counted, creating an apparent rank boost even when real performance stays the same.
What Do These Real-World Analyses Reveal After Google Removes num=100?
Case Study 1: Search Engine Roundtable — GSC Reporting Disruptions
Search Engine Roundtable documented that many site owners noticed significant changes in their Google Search Console performance reports right after Google disabled showing 100 results per page.
The article highlights that impressions dropped sharply, and average position metrics jumped, patterns that align with removing deep-ranking impressions.
- Discovery Date: September 2025, immediately after the &num=100 deprecation took effect.
- Issue: GSC began showing large impression declines and position shifts without any known algorithm update.
- Impact: Many users reported that third-party tools relying on &num=100 were “broken” or dysfunctional.
- Actions Taken: Public commentary from SEO voices like Brodie Clark highlighted the phenomenon; SEOs began interrogating GSC data anomalies.
- Recovery Timeline: Over the following days and weeks, patterns stabilized as SEOs adjusted to the new data paradigm.
Lessons Learned: GSC metrics can shift drastically from a structural change — not all drops indicate ranking issues. Tools and analysts must expect and adapt to reporting resets in search data.
Case Study 2: Matthew Mellinger — 100 Site GSC Data Review
Matthew Mellinger shared on LinkedIn that he “looked at the GSC data across 100 sites to observe how the num=100 deprecation affected performance metrics. Though full details were behind the LinkedIn wall, the preview suggests a broad empirical look at how impression trends shifted after Google removed the parameter.
- Discovery Date: Around mid-September 2025 (post-update).
- Issue: Broad sampling across 100 sites to detect consistent patterns in GSC metrics post-change.
- Impact (Inferred): Likely widespread impression declines and position metric changes across these 100 sites.
- Actions Taken (Inferred): Analysis to back decisions, share insights publicly, and help SEO community understand systemic effects.
- Recovery Timeline: Not stated publicly — would depend on how each site normalizes to new reporting norms.
Lessons Learned (Tentative): A cross-site sample size of 100 helps validate that the num=100 removal isn’t just an isolated artifact for a few domains — it’s an industry-level data shift. Once you confirm the full post, you can refine the metrics and outcomes.
Explore More SEO Guides
- Mobile SEO: Optimize mobile speed, UX, and rankings across devices.
- Digital PR SEO: Earn high-authority links via newsworthy digital PR campaigns.
- Informational Content SEO: Optimize content for search queries to drive traffic and engagement.
- Next.js SEO: Tactics for optimizing SEO on Next.js sites.
- UX SEO: Improve engagement signals with accessible, user-centric site experiences.
FAQs
What was the &num=100 parameter in Google Search?
When did Google remove the &num=100 parameter?
Why did impressions drop in Google Search Console?
Did my rankings actually fall because of this update?
Which SEO tools were most affected by the num=100 removal?
Will Google ever restore the &num=100 parameter?
Does this change affect AI search or data visibility?
Conclusion
As I’ve explored, the update where Google removes num=100 has transformed how SEOs track visibility and interpret performance. By focusing on accurate data, long-tail strategies, and smarter reporting, we can move toward more realistic, user-driven SEO insights.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on Google removing num=100. Have you seen changes in your Search Console impressions or rankings? Share your experience in the comments ,your insights could help others adapt to this new era of SEO measurement.
