Australia’s AI Innovation ‘Dire,’ Top Scientist Warns of Falling Behind!

Australia has fallen behind in the global AI landscape, with a lack of skilled talent, insufficient research funding, and weak industry support, according to NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer, Professor Hugh Durrant-Whyte.

Speaking at a Universities Australia summit, he expressed serious concerns over the country’s failure to develop a competitive AI sector.

“At this point, we are nowhere in the race. If I pick the top 100 people in AI in the world, not one of them is from Australia,” Durrant-Whyte stated.

Despite global advancements in AI-driven industries such as healthcare, defense, and automation, Australia has failed to position itself as a leader in AI innovation.

“Australia is a bit of a basket case, really, if you don’t mind me saying.”

Talent Drain: The Loss of Australia’s Best AI Minds

Australia’s inability to retain AI talent is one of the biggest challenges limiting its competitiveness.

Over the last decade, the country has lost many of its leading AI researchers to overseas institutions and tech companies.

“I ran a government-funded organisation about a decade ago now and we had 200 of the top researchers in AI in that organisation. Every single one of them is overseas now,” Durrant-Whyte revealed.

The issue is not just about talent leaving but also about the failure to attract world-class AI professionals.

While countries like the U.S. and China aggressively invest in AI expertise, Australia has few incentives to keep its top researchers at home.

Private sector investment in AI is also lagging, with a lack of major industry-backed AI hubs and limited venture capital for AI startups.

This creates a weak AI ecosystem that struggles to compete with leading global technology hubs.

Regulatory Focus vs. Innovation: Australia’s AI Policy Misstep

Durrant-Whyte was critical of Australia’s policy direction, pointing out that the government has prioritized AI regulation over fostering innovation.

“There is no support for doing anything in AI other than regulation at the moment in Australia,” he said.

Instead of focusing on building AI infrastructure, funding startups, or creating research-industry partnerships, policymakers have been more concerned with the ethical and legal risks of AI.

While other nations balance regulation with investment, Australia has failed to create an environment that encourages AI entrepreneurship.

“It’s not a question of money, not a question of infrastructure — I think the thing always that the US does well is they innovate, and I think that’s Europe’s falling at this point.”

Beyond Chatbots: AI’s Real-World Impact in Science and Industry

Although large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have received the most public attention, Durrant-Whyte emphasized that the most transformative AI applications lie outside of chatbots.

“There are all these huge areas of AI which are making a really profound impact upon what we do in research and teaching and so on, but they’re not LLMs.”

Despite these advancements, Australia is not leading in any of these areas, largely due to a lack of funding and weak collaboration between universities and industry.

Durrant-Whyte also questioned the long-term value of LLMs, predicting that their popularity may decline as industries realize their limitations.

“I think by the end of this year we will fall off a cliff with LLMs and people will realise what they’re good and what they’re not good for.”

What Needs to Change: A Call for Action

Durrant-Whyte’s assessment is a warning to policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders. If Australia does not act soon, it risks being permanently sidelined in AI-driven global markets.

Without these changes, Australia’s AI sector will continue to fall behind, missing critical opportunities for economic growth, technological leadership, and international influence in AI development.

For more news and trends, visit AI News on our website.