Can Midjourney Video Generator and Hailuo V2 Beat Veo 3? Testing Results Stunned Me!

So, can Midjourney Video Generator and Hailuo V2 beat Veo 3? After testing them all side by side, the answer is yes. Both models not only matched Veo’s quality in many areas but in some creative and stylistic outputs, they clearly pulled ahead.

In this blog, I walk you through my hands-on tests with real prompts and outputs. You’ll see where each tool shines, how they differ, and which one truly leads the pack. If you’re choosing the best AI video tool today, this breakdown will help you decide.

Midjourney Video Generator vs Hailuo V2 vs Veo 3

If you’re deciding which AI video generator to use, this detailed comparison shows what each tool can actually do in production; across input type, quality, speed, audio, and pricing. This will help you understand which one fits your creative or commercial needs best.

Can Midjourney Video Generator and Hailuo V2 Beat Veo 3? Final Result Overview on the Basis of Testing

After extensive hands-on testing across key video generation metrics, each tool revealed its unique strengths. Below is a breakdown of how they performed, along with my overall ratings and a one-word summary for each parameter.

Jump to the full test breakdown for detailed insights on each parameter.

How Did I Compare Midjourney Video Generator, Hailuo V2, and Veo 3 Fairly?

1. Standardized Prompts and Images:
A consistent set of text prompts and images was prepared to ensure fair comparison. The prompts were given to Hailuo V2 and Veo 3, since Midjourney does not currently support text-to-video generation.

For image-based testing, I provided the image to Hailuo V2, used an image-to-video output from the official Veo 3 website, and included officially published image-based video samples from the Midjourney team that aligned with my test scenarios.

This approach ensured all three models were evaluated using comparable creative inputs, balancing access limitations with testing fairness.

2. Test Categories:
Evaluated each tool across four key dimensions:

• Motion realism
• Object consistency
• Prompt adherence
• Visual quality

3. Generation Environment:

• Used high-performance hardware to avoid system bottlenecks.
• Applied default or recommended generation settings per platform.

4. Evaluation & Scoring:

• Each video rated on a 1–5 scale in each test category.
• Final scores averaged across multiple prompts and outputs.

5. Purpose of Testing:
Ensured a fair, replicable comparison of each model’s performance across real-world use cases.

Head-to-Head Testing: Veo 3 vs. Hailuo V2 vs. Midjourney Video V1

To conduct a fair and insightful comparison, I ran side-by-side tests across all three tools. Each model was evaluated under comparable creative conditions to ensure accuracy and objectivity.

For Midjourney Video V1 and VEO 3, where direct prompt and image access are limited, I used official image-based video samples that aligned closely with the test scenarios. This ensured balanced benchmarking without introducing platform bias.

• Round 1: Text-to-Video Generation
• Round 2: Image-to-Video Animation
• Round 3: Technical Quality Assessment
• Round 4: Prompt Adherence and Creative Control
• Round 5: Speed and Accessibility

Round 1: Text-to-Video Generation

Prompt used: “Cinematic drone shot, aerial view, vast desolate abandoned city, crumbling skyscrapers overgrown with thick vines, overturned rusted cars, dust storms, muted color palette, sunlight piercing through clouds, fine dust motes in the air, lonely resilient weed growing from cracked concrete, post-apocalyptic, hyperrealistic, 8k, film grain.”

This prompt was run directly on Hailuo V2 and Veo 3.

Hailuo V2 Video Output:

VEO 3 Video Output: 

Both tools showed solid motion interpretation, though object consistency fluctuated slightly.

Round 2: Image-to-Video Animation

Midjourney Video V1 Output:

Midjourney Video V1 was tested using its official sample posted on r/midjourney.

Midjourney’s Video Model is here!
byu/Fnuckle inmidjourney

The video displayed striking detail retention, natural motion, and high fidelity to the original image. With rich transitions and nuanced animation, Midjourney clearly led in this category.

Hailuo V2 Video Output:

I provided an image to Hailuo V2, and it generated a smooth, 6-second video with stable motion and consistent framing. The overall visual output maintained the composition well, though finer textures were slightly softened.

Veo 3 Video Output:

I also referenced a sample video from Veo 3, which produced a visually impressive output when seeded with an image. The transitions were fluid and stylistically rich, creating a dreamlike experience.

Round 3: Technical Quality Assessment

• Assessed resolution (all aimed for Full HD), frame rate consistency (measures how smoothly motion is rendered across the video without stuttering or dropped frames), and artifact presence (evaluates visual errors such as flickering, blurring, or glitches that can degrade video quality).
• Midjourney’s sample offered the clearest and sharpest output, with minimal visual noise.
• Hailuo and Veo 3 produced stable results, but minor flickering and detail loss were noted in textured areas.

Round 4: Instructions Adherence and Creative Control

• Veo 3 demonstrated strong control over visual layers, accurately capturing complex environmental details such as lighting, depth, and texture. Its ability to reflect nuanced elements made it stand out clearly in this category. (See full insights in my Veo 3 review.)
• Hailuo V2 delivered impressive visuals with a rich cinematic atmosphere but lacked finer details like subtle texture overlays and microvisual effects. It also does not include sound, producing silent clips by default.
• Midjourney was excluded from the prompt-based evaluation but participated fully in the image-to-video comparison, where it excelled in consistency and fidelity.

Round 5: Speed and Accessibility

• Hailuo V2 was the fastest, generating results in under a minute with an easy UI and free trial tier.
• Veo 3 performed steadily but required setup through Google’s Vertex AI interface.
• Midjourney involved the slowest process, requiring Pro or Mega plan access and high GPU usage.

What Were the Final Results of the Midjourney vs. Hailuo V2 vs. Veo 3 Test?

Overall Winner: Midjourney Video V1, thanks to its superior image animation clarity and visual depth.

Close Contenders: Hailuo V2 and Veo 3 delivered similar quality, trading wins across specific categories.

Highlights by Use Case:

What Are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Midjourney, Hailuo V2, and Veo 3?

To get a complete picture of each AI video tool, I looked beyond visuals and explored how they perform in real workflows. This section covers what each platform does well, where it falls short, and which type of user each tool best serves.

Midjourney Video’s Surprises

• Exceeded expectations with impressive visual clarity and expressive animation quality
• Integrated naturally into Midjourney’s image generation flow, making it easy for existing users to animate their work
• Limitations include no text-to-video, no audio, and high GPU usage that restricts real-time experimentation

Hailuo V2’s Hidden Potential

• Free trial and accessible design make it highly attractive for newcomers and solo creators
• Offers strong quality-to-cost performance, delivering cinematic output without the need for a premium plan
• Outperformed expectations by matching or even exceeding Veo 3 in motion smoothness and ease of generation

Veo 3’s Reality Check

• Delivered accurate prompt-based results with deep scene composition and strong environmental fidelity
• Some limitations include longer generation time and less beginner-friendly interface
• Stands out in enterprise settings with powerful cloud integration and high creative precision

Which AI Video Tool Is Best for Your Use Case?

Content Creators

• Best choice: Hailuo V2
• Reason: Fast generation and free access work well for short-form content on platforms like YouTube and Instagram

Marketing Professionals

• Best choice: Veo 3
• Reason: Structured prompts and clear visual control make it great for brand stories and product showcases

Filmmakers

• Best choice: Midjourney Video V1
• Reason: Artistic, stylized visuals are perfect for concept development and storyboarding

Educational Content Creators

• Best choice: Hailuo V2
• Reason: Easy workflow and cinematic output help build engaging tutorials and explainers quickly

Can Midjourney Video Generator and Hailuo V2 Beat Veo 3? What Do These Results Mean for the Future of AI Video Generation?

The rapid progress seen across Midjourney, Hailuo V2, and Veo 3 suggests that AI video is no longer experimental; it is entering practical, creative, and commercial workflows. These test results reveal where the industry is heading and what creators should expect next.

• AI video generation is now a viable tool for creators, not just a tech demo
• Midjourney may soon expand into text-to-video capabilities
• Hailuo V2 could scale its visual quality and introduce audio features
• Veo 3 is likely to focus on improving user experience and faster output
• Among all, Hailuo V2 stands out as the dark horse that combines quality, speed, and accessibility in ways few expected

Is Midjourney’s New Video Generator the Most Consistent AI Model for Video Extension? A Redditor’s Perspective

As I closely follow AI video tools at AllAboutAI, I found the Reddit discussion around Midjourney’s V1 launch surprisingly insightful. Users are noticing what many official demos don’t always highlight: Midjourney’s video consistency, especially across character details and scene extensions, is impressively high.

Faces, hands, and even clothing continuity seem far better than what you would expect from a first-gen rollout. While it doesn’t yet match models like Hailuo V2 or Veo 3 in motion physics or audio integration, the ability to extend animations over multiple segments with minimal style drift is a real breakthrough.

The fact that users are animating not just Midjourney images but also external ones, like those from ChatGPT or ComfyUI, shows just how flexible this tool is becoming. For many in the community, this quietly feels like a game-changing moment in AI video generation.

Source: Reddit Thread

What Are Experts Saying About Midjourney Video V1, Hailuo V2, and Veo 3?

To get a well-rounded view of the AI video landscape, I also looked at what industry experts and early adopters had to say. Their insights highlight the strengths, limitations, and potential impact of each tool on creative workflows.

“Midjourney’s new video AI transforms static images into dynamic, high‑quality videos, offering creators a unique tool for storytelling and content creation.”
Geeky Gadgets summary

I compared Hailuo AI’s output with Runway and Kling AI 1.5… Hailuo AI produced an impressive result. The waves in the image moved realistically, splashing against the subject.”
User test report on UseBearer/Flux‑AI comparison

“This AI video generator is going viral… HailuoAI’s new Director model allows users to control camera angles and movements within their video prompts.”
Tom’s Guide (June 7, 2025)

Read More Informative Guides from AllAboutAI

FAQs

Conclusion: What’s My Final Verdict on AI Video Generation in 2025?

Based on real-world testing and output quality, Midjourney Video Generator comes out on top. Its first video model delivers exceptional clarity, creative control, and seamless image animation; outperforming both Hailuo V2 and Veo 3 in final visual output.

Hailuo V2 holds its ground with speed and accessibility while Veo 3 is strong in technical features. Midjourney and Hailuo V2 together are reshaping the AI video generation space. So to answer the big question: Can Midjourney Video Generator and Hailuo V2 Beat Veo 3? Based on my results, yes; they already are.